This test scenario uses all of your system's processing power to render a photo-realistic 3D scene (from the viral "No Keyframes" animation by AixSponza). MAXON software has been used in blockbuster movies such as Spider-Man, Star Wars, The Chronicles of Narnia and many more. CINEBENCH is based on MAXON's animation software CINEMA 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. Its routines have been written to be cache efficient, and to take the maximum advantage possible of the new multi-threading capabilities present in modern CPU architectures. Being a highly-optimized and extremely math-intensive application (mostly in floating-point) which makes a very efficient use of the system's cache, we think that FryRender is the near perfect tool for measuring "how much brute computational power" a computer is able to deliver.ĬINEBENCH is a real-world cross platform test suite that evaluates your computer's performance capabilities. As a result, and after several years of intense development, FryRender's core doesn't let a single CPU cycle be wasted. Since its conception, FryRender has been designed with the aim of being the most muscled engine in its category. Processor Performance: FryRenderįryRender is a benchmarking framework for everyone, not just for 3D users anyone out there, from hardware integrators or hardware reviewers to die-hard gamers. Some processor series however have been able to reach higher turbo bins, Kaby Lake certainly can manage good and high clocks though. IPS perf did advance from Haswell to Skylake and now Kaby Lake, we are however talking roughly 10% there. This actually has not changed in hugely massive steps ever since Sandy-Bridge in 2011. Once you clock them the same, they perform (roughly) the same. Aside from a minor platform offset, as you can see, an Intel core is an Intel core. We can easily normalize that and downclocked the 7700K cores to 4200 MHz. What about actual IPC clock for clock performance then? Well, the Core i7 6700K runs at a 4.20 MHz turbo, the Core i7 7700K at 4.50. Unfortunately not all software makes use of many cores/threads, including games, hence per core perf matters more opposed to having, say, 8 cores over a quad-core processor. Once you start to accumulate more cores the relative performance will jump up fast, of course. It is all relative of course, as below we look at multiple cores combined. It actually is a pretty nice little performance measurement to test the RAW CPU performance, next to that the performance is measured both as per core and multi-threaded core performance. Here are some numbers, we'll build up more results over time:įor single core performance it's all about clock frequency, and Intel did apply very high Turbo bins at 4500 MHz for the 7700K. I decided to include the results as it offers something you can easily replicate and try at home. CPU-Z was recently updated with a fairly quick to run, yet seriously proper benchmark.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |